There is an unsaved comment in progress. You will lose your changes if you continue. Are you sure you want to reopen the work item?
Order of table defs matters?
Maybe this is an easy question, but I'm using Sterling in my phone project and I create new table defs as I develop and add more support for it.
Does the order in which you list the table definitions matter? I have two singleton settings models, DbSettings and LocalSettings, and at first I had LocalSettings defined first. Then a little later, I added the DbSettings definition above it.
Now Sterling throws an exception if I try to load the DbSettings saying it cannot cast LocalSettings to DbSettings.
Is this expected behavior? I didn't see order of table definitions mentioned in the docs. I assumed it did lookups based on the type of the table.