Are there any plans for this? (if it doesn't do so already)
For example I'd prefer not to pollute my model classes with [SterlingIgnore] attribute which has a dependency on the sterling libraries.
I'd much rather make use of the existing [IgnoreDataMember] in the System.Runtime.Serialization library.
ie: It'd be nice if I could tell Sterling to honor the System.Runtime.Serialization constructs when saving to the database,
just as the DataContractSerializer would do.